Current:Home > BackAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight-VaTradeCoin
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View Date:2025-01-08 16:21:28
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (69)
Related
- OneTaste Founder Nicole Daedone Speaks Out on Sex Cult Allegations Against Orgasmic Meditation Company
- Morpheus8 Review: Breaking Down Kim Kardashian's Go-To Skin-Tightening Treatment
- NFL schedule today: Everything to know about playoff games on Jan. 28
- Houston pair accused of running funeral home without a license
- Birth control and abortion pill requests have surged since Trump won the election
- How Dakota Johnson Honored Taylor Swift on SNL
- Taylor Swift and Jason Kelce Support Travis Kelce at AFC Championship
- San Francisco 49ers have gold rush in second half of NFC championship
- Question of a lifetime: Families prepare to confront 9/11 masterminds
- Zebras and camels rescued from trailer fire in Indiana
Ranking
- Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul referee handled one of YouTuber's biggest fights
- Alex Murdaugh tries to prove jury tampering led to his murder conviction
- Scott Boras' very busy day: Four MLB free agent contracts and a Hall of Fame election
- Report: California officers shot in ambush were not verbally warned that suspect had gun, was on PCP
- Wheel of Fortune Contestant Goes Viral Over His Hilariously Wrong Answer
- See the moment climate activists throw soup at the ‘Mona Lisa’ in Paris
- Biden and senators on verge of striking immigration deal aimed at clamping down on illegal border crossings
- 'Gray divorce' rates have doubled. But it's a costly move, especially for women
Recommendation
-
Contained, extinguished and mopping up: Here’s what some common wildfire terms mean
-
Morpheus8 Review: Breaking Down Kim Kardashian's Go-To Skin-Tightening Treatment
-
Small biz owners scale back their office space or go remote altogether. Some move to the suburbs
-
'Days of Wine and Roses,' a film about love and addiction, is now a spirited musical
-
Voters in California city reject measure allowing noncitizens to vote in local races
-
Chiefs' path back to Super Bowl stage looked much different than past runs
-
American Airlines’ hard landing on Maui sends 6 to hospital
-
Husband's 911 call key in reaching verdict in Alabama mom's murder, says juror